The Old Wisdom That Carried Us Out of the West Must Return
Inscription at Krak des Chevalires which says, 'Grace, wisdom and beauty you may enjoy, but beware pride which alone can tarnish all the rest.' |
Introduction with Context
I consider myself like Lincoln in that when a certain question vexes me, I cannot release it until I have absolutely put it to bed. This question of late for me has been a subject I've termed, "Racial Politics." I've written on it repeatedly because it is a topic I have been forced to deal with endlessly, as many of us have. I consider myself a shepherd of sorts and responsible for those of you who follow the Imperium. I don't want to lead us astray or down any course that leads to failure or evil. So I feel the need often to speak my mind. The greatest weakness of "Traditionalism" is a lack of cohesion; my principle goal with the NSIR was to give Catholic Traditionalism that focus and direction it needs to be effective. In a base sort of way, we all know what we want: the restoration of Christendom for the assistance of the salvation of souls by the Church, and an environment in which that mission is best carried out. That is to say, a truly and authentically Catholic civilization. The trouble is, how do you define that? Many have asked me for defining literature on the subject, and I have been powerless to provide any. While there is a wealth of resources from which our platform is drawn, it is all very scattered. Hence why I am continuing to work on the Imperial Manifesto that will outline our platform in a concrete way. Maybe this will be the last time I discuss this on my blog for a while; I feel like it ought to be. I don't know how much clearer I can be on the subject.
"The Peacemakers." |
Essay
I’ve written repeatedly on race relations over the past
few days. If there’s one thing I don’t like in any sort of politics, its
redundancy. Redundancy generally points to a lack of progress; the same ground
being retreaded over and over again without any clear resolution in sight.
Deadlock and uncompromised have become so routine in Republican and Democratic
nations that we may wonder how it has ever been any other way. Believe it or
not, “Enlightened” people of the Modern World, there was a time when political
ambitions tended to a logical end. When ideology went around what was best for
the State and not simply the individual – who benefits when the State benefits
and hurts when the State hurts regardless of what kind of state rules him – and
positions that did not benefit the whole quickly became discarded.
Tsar Shuisky and his Brothers before the King Sigismund III in the Senate Chamber at the Royal Castle in Warsaw. |
It has come to such a point that the Parties manipulate
the electorate based on these divisions. They control trade, information,
media, etc. and with a flick of their wrists they can make us throw ourselves
upon one another in rage or segregate ourselves from one another in
indignation. We are like Pavlov’s dogs, salivating on command when the thing we
are drooling over is not even a reality. Local incidents of violence and
injustice that smaller judiciaries could otherwise be trusted to handle are
thrown upon the mob like kindling to the fire. We are shown the “reality” of an
America that is racially divided and boiling over with hatred. Worse yet we are
giving the problem absolute hues of black and white in more ways than one.
Democrats and Republicans are either willingly choosing
sides or being forced to take on or the other based on the realities of the
electorate. Liberal and Conservative are becoming synonymous with “Person of
Color and Poor” and “White and Wealthy.” This is dangerous beyond words and
should throw up red flags to anyone with a knowledge of history. But alas I
feel like John the Baptist, the lone voice crying out in the midst of two great
armies. Like Gandalf between the Dwarves, Men, and Elves I desperately warn
those involved in a petty squabble over their impending doom at the hands of a
much larger and mutual adversary.
I recently took it upon myself to learn about Black
Supremacy. I am so used to dealing with White Supremacy I almost forget the
other exists. In our society it’s remarkably easy to find, either because White
Supremacists are open about their beliefs as it is or a lynch mob has already
formed around them calling for their deaths. What’s gone almost completely
ignored due to our strident disdain for one is that “African Americans” have
their own rampant version of this.
I perused tumblrs, blogs, facebooks, along with
historical primary sources from figures in the philosophy of “Black Power,”
everything you can imagine. What I found was almost the same rhetoric used by
White Supremacists, save the Black Supremacists argue from a very different
position or speak as though they do. I tried to imagine White Supremacists
saying the same thing as Black Supremacists (not hard, seeing they already do).
“Worry about your own
people’s future and don’t integrate.”
“You can’t trust the
government.”
“The time for uprising is
now.”
“We need communities of
our own race.”
“The system is rigged
against us.”
“We need to arm ourselves
and prepare for war.”
“We need to get them
before they get us.”
“Race-mixing is betraying
your heritage; those who do so are traitors.”
Do you doubt me? I ask that you look for yourself. See
what they and others say on the subject. What you will see are two groups of
people on a crash course for conflict; once minorities, the present political
climate has thrown them to the forefront once again. Since Barack Obama’s
presidency began in 2008 there has been a huge spike in the growth of Race
Advocacy groups. Whether or not a racially divided America that could be
manipulated by the Democrats was intentional or not I cannot say, but
regardless it is happening. I theorize that all it will take to push America
over the brink is a staunchly Conservative, White Republican Strongman for
President who repeals forcefully the acts of his predecessors.
St. Canute IV; Martyr and King of Denmark, date of birth uncertain; died 10 July 1086, the third of the thirteen natural sons of Sweyn II surnamed Estridsen. |
Would the “Democratic” system make this fair game? If
it’s how the Democrats did it, it’s how the Republicans are allowed to do it.
No, it does not make it fair, because any system where the majority with force
of law oppresses a minority is unjust. Justice is blind and cannot see the
Black Man and the White Man. The fact is that trust in the Republic has eroded
beyond all repair; what has kept the United States alive is the faith of its
people in their form of government. The gentleman’s way has long since passed
out of the hearts and minds of the American people and has been replaced by the
idea that we must do literally anything in the pursuit of the right thing,
ignoring the fact that even the most just goal can be tainted with the methods
used to achieve it. We are getting very close to the violent deposition of
legitimate authority; history tells us that once this threshold is crossed
there is no going back. Once you have removed the sanctity of government it
becomes up for grabs. What Liberals might take by force from Conservatives, the
Conservatives can now also take back my force. If you want to ask how
legitimacy born through the barrel of a gun works out for a nation, you can ask
the Africans and the Asians.
The fact is Racial Advocacy groups must be demolished in
their entirety within the United States of America. For the good of national
stability we must redefine what makes America and go to a Roman model of
citizenship, under which one’s status as an American supersedes everything
else. In such a system all Americans are entitled in law to the same benefits
and treatment; under such rule all Americans also have the same duties to the
State. Not just equality but justice should reign in America. Our Pledge of
Allegiance reads, “With Liberty and Justice for All.” True equality is only
found in just treatment; to do otherwise is to put the card before the horse.
We must not only destroy Race Politics, we must make them invalid.
One is tempted to think that perhaps this will lead via
Social Darwinism to the eventual domination of one race regardless. I question
how that is possible if race is nothing more than a descriptor, and all are
considered equally American. It is highly more likely that under the current
system where both sides want the same thing (supposedly) and one side is
endlessly suppressed while the other is applauded or benignly neglected (the
reality) that we shall see the ultimate dominance of one group over the other
via the iron boot of one pressing down upon the neck of the other in a quest to
ensure that “Never Again” is one group oppressed by another in one of the
cruelest and unjust acts of irony we may ever see in human history.
The Natives of Cumaná attack the mission after Gonzalez de Ocampo's slaving raid. Colored copperplate by Theodor de Bry, published in the Relación brevissima. |
Humans naturally buck against tyranny. The Bolshevik
Revolution was overwhelmingly Jewish, and this has been used by Anti-Semites as
a means of fueling their canards about the Hebrew quest for a One World Jewish
Order. The facts are much less complicated; the Jews were persecuted by the
Romanovs via pogroms which they themselves enacted or ignored and allowed to
happen without repercussion. If the Portuguese, French, English, Spanish,
Polish, and German Medieval Monarchs had ignored Rome’s Sicut Judaeris and allowed violent persecution of the Jews to go
unpunished, something similar might of happened (it did for the Visigoths, I
should mention). There are numerous examples of this happening all across
history which do not involve Jews. It’s not a whether or not a minority
persecuted due to their race or religious creed will occur: it’s when and if
they will succeed. Let’s assume for a moment that the Anti-Semites and their
doctrine cancerously spread to and claimed the entire world; it is then that a true Jewish Empire would emerge, and
hilariously enough it would be because the world believed one already existed
in the first place.
Saint Gregory the Great. |
The Romans – who every nation on Earth in the West claims
to be the inheritors of – understood this. They did not persecute based on race;
however, if a racial minority collectively rose against Rome (as the Jews did
in Judea, or the Germanic Tribes did under the Suebi, or the Gauls did under
Vercingetorix, or the Britons did under Boudica) they were not afraid to attack
the source of the problem and pull it up root and stem. By doing so they
avoided racial prejudices until the Late Empire when it was in its decline and
being overtaken by the Barbarians and all sense of imperial unity was eroding.
Caesar would never have tolerated racial division in his
imperium, nor would any racial advocacy groups have lingered for long in Rome
had they formed within the Senate in the first place. Medieval kingdoms lacked
them entirely, even though among “White Europeans” there was plenty of
racially-based division between various ethnic groups in their own countries.
They possessed a unifying principle that brought them all together. For the
Romans it was the Emperor and Empire; for Christendom it was the Monarch and
the Catholic Faith. For Americans it must be America, or we will not ever ling
as long as our predecessors from which we are descended. For the New Holy Roman Empire - the Novum Sacrum Imperium Romanum - our Point of Unity will always be the Roman Catholic Faith.
Doge Antonio Grimani Kneeling before the Faith 1575-76 by Titian. |
In order for your concept of American Citizenship to succeed, it must be extended to all social classes, to women, to people of color, to Native Americans, and all genders and sexual orientation. It must stop the marginalization and oppression of these groups from Eurocentric Christian power. Decolonization begins at home, and campuses have so far led the way.
ReplyDeleteIt does extend to every American Citizen. I have no idea how to decipher the rest of your tumblr gibberish. If you really think America is "Eurocentric" or "Christian," I'm not sure what to say.
Delete